<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3A1150-1151</id>
	<title>Template:1150-1151 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Template%3A1150-1151"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-23T13:54:06Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=4529&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jere Krischel at 09:36, 11 February 2006</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=4529&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-02-11T09:36:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;amp;diff=4529&amp;amp;oldid=4437&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jere Krischel</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=4437&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Ken Conklin at 17:24, 8 February 2006</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=4437&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2006-02-08T17:24:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;amp;diff=4437&amp;amp;oldid=2729&quot;&gt;Show changes&lt;/a&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Ken Conklin</name></author>
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=2729&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Jere Krischel at 05:19, 12 December 2005</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://morganreport.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Template:1150-1151&amp;diff=2729&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2005-12-12T05:19:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;1150 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. I conhl not sny that I am familiar.&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. There is a reef that runs around tlie island, and&lt;br /&gt;
wherever tliere is a stream of fresh water coming down from the hill&lt;br /&gt;
it cuts a channel—the coral will not grow, and that has left that little&lt;br /&gt;
pocket in there. It is very small.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. How many ships of war could harbor there1?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Tliere is not room enough for a ship to swing at anchor.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. HOW far from the line of the bay are the elevations&lt;br /&gt;
that surround Honolulu?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. The first one is the hill called the Punch Bowl, an&lt;br /&gt;
extinct volcano, that lies behind the town a mile and a quarter or a&lt;br /&gt;
mile and a half from the water. It runs down to a flat plain on the&lt;br /&gt;
edge of the water with this coral reef.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Could not guns be placed on the hills in such position&lt;br /&gt;
and with such range as would enable those maintaining them there&lt;br /&gt;
to keep a fleet off?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. If the fleet fired to destroy the town, they would not&lt;br /&gt;
pay much attention to the batteries up there. And it would not be a&lt;br /&gt;
difficult matter to hit the town.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. I suppose, therefore, you think that men-of-war&lt;br /&gt;
that might be in the bay for repairs and for provisions or coal would&lt;br /&gt;
not be made secure by fortifications around the harbor?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not for Honolulu. It would be a very great&lt;br /&gt;
expense building forts outside. I do not think it could be done; it&lt;br /&gt;
would not be practicable.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. HOW would it be in Pearl Harbor?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. There you have different conditions. The harbor is&lt;br /&gt;
very deep inside and it runs a good ways back. I think it must run&lt;br /&gt;
5 or 6 miles back in toward the center of the island.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. It also has tongues of land running out into it?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes—side bays. But most of it is quite deep, and that,&lt;br /&gt;
with the range of modern artillery on board ship, make it pretty warm&lt;br /&gt;
for anybody inside there.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. It is what the naval officers would call a well-sheltered&lt;br /&gt;
place?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes. There is a good deal of work to be done to make&lt;br /&gt;
it available. My recollection is that something like a quarter to a half&lt;br /&gt;
mile of excavations would be necessary. Whether that is sand or coral&lt;br /&gt;
we do not know; there have not been any borings.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose it is coral. Is that difficult to excavate&lt;br /&gt;
under water?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not nowadays, with modern dredging.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. And once excavated, it is easy to keep it open?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. You can keep it open very readily, I think, as soon as&lt;br /&gt;
they get the mouth of Honolulu Harbor cleared out. This plant belongs&lt;br /&gt;
to the Government, and they are going to send it down to Pearl Harbor;&lt;br /&gt;
that was the intention when I left there—to see if they can not deepen&lt;br /&gt;
the mouth of it. There is one thing to be said about it, it would make&lt;br /&gt;
another port there for the people of Honolulu and would throw cut&lt;br /&gt;
some of those who are in business, because it would make a better&lt;br /&gt;
harbor than at Honolulu.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. If you were putting the steamer Boston to sea for a&lt;br /&gt;
voyage into the Pacific Ocean and back around Cape Horn, could you&lt;br /&gt;
carry coal enough on the Boston to reach Australia and back to the&lt;br /&gt;
mouth of the Chesapeake?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. NO.&lt;br /&gt;
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 1151&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. How far would you be able to steam with the coal&lt;br /&gt;
you could carry on the Boston ?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. I never served on the Boston; I could only give you&lt;br /&gt;
my impression. I do not think her steaming radius is over 3,500 miles.&lt;br /&gt;
She is one of the old type of ships.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Take the best of modern ships—cruisers which&lt;br /&gt;
have large capacity for carrying coal, and built purposely for that.&lt;br /&gt;
What is the steaming radius of those ships?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Probably the steaming radius of the Columbia is the&lt;br /&gt;
largest. My impression is that at her most economical speed she has&lt;br /&gt;
something like 10,000 miles. The Philadelphia has probably 0,000 miles,&lt;br /&gt;
and the San Francisco has probably 5,000.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. That means 5,000 miles out and back?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Five thousand miles alone.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. YOU could not take either of those ships from the&lt;br /&gt;
mouth of the Chesapeake Bay around to San Francisco, and when you&lt;br /&gt;
arrived there have them in fighting condition?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. No; you would have to stop on the way.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Where would you stop ?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. In time of peace?&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Any time.&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. We have any number of stations—a dozen or more&lt;br /&gt;
coaling commercial stations all through the West Indies; Pernambuco,&lt;br /&gt;
Brazil; Bahia, Eio Janeiro, Montevideo, and Sandy Point,&lt;br /&gt;
Straits of Magellan, and Callao; and also Panama and Valparaiso.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. At Valparaiso you would find coal?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes; and at Callao.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. In time of war you could not obtain coal supplies&lt;br /&gt;
for the naval vessels?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. I believe coal is contraband.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. SO that in time of war if you wanted to carry coal&lt;br /&gt;
for the best cruiser you have from Chesapeake Bay to San Francisco,&lt;br /&gt;
you.would not find her in fighting trim when you got to San Francisco?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. No.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Do you not think that under such circumstances it&lt;br /&gt;
would be of advantage to the United States to have at some point in&lt;br /&gt;
the Pacific, away from our coast, places where we have the right of&lt;br /&gt;
control, and places where we could protect our coal supplies?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. I see what you are leading up to. We could not reach&lt;br /&gt;
Honolulu.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. We could reach Samoa, could we not?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. NO.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose we were already at Samoa and at Honolulu&lt;br /&gt;
and had our supplies, and we had to combat with the ships that&lt;br /&gt;
would come from the Mediterranean and around the Horn for the purpose&lt;br /&gt;
of attacking the coast of California, which country would have&lt;br /&gt;
the advantage in a military sense in such an arrangement as that?&lt;br /&gt;
Mr. LUDLOW. Samoa would have to be counted out. It is over 6,000&lt;br /&gt;
miles from there, and we are 2,000 miles from Honolulu.&lt;br /&gt;
The CHAIRMAN. My question is that we are already in possession of&lt;br /&gt;
Samoa and Honolulu, and we have sufficient coal there to supply any&lt;br /&gt;
emergency whatever. Then the question would be, having the right&lt;br /&gt;
to coal your ships at those points, and protecting them and protecting&lt;br /&gt;
your depot of supplies, would you have an advantage over a maritime&lt;br /&gt;
power that had to cross the Atlantic and come around the Horn, or&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jere Krischel</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>