Jere Krischel at 03:26, 23 December 2005

2005-12-23T03:26:53Z

Jere Krischel at 04:53, 12 December 2005

2005-12-12T04:53:03Z

New page

878 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
The CHAIRMAN. Are fish abundant off the coast of those islands?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes; but fish commands a higher price in Honolulu
than in any seaport town I have ever lived in. That is because
the native will not go fishing unless the price of fish is high.
The CHAIRMAN. They are expert fishermen?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes.
The CHAIRMAN. And they have control of the fisheries?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. NO; the Chinese have most of the fishing rights.
There is a peculiar condition of affairs there in regard to the fisheries.
The water front of the islands is owned by the landlords—the jieople
who own the land—and the privilege of fishing on this water front is
leased out.
The CHAIRMAN. By the owner of the soil ?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. By the owner of the soil. So that the Chinese
have been rather encroaching on that privilege and getting most of
the valuable fishing rights.
The CHAIRMAN. HOW far out in the sea does this privilege extend?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. I can not say as to that.
The CHAIRMAN. DO the Hawaiians and Chinese fish offshore in boats
and with seines and other tackle?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes.
The CHAIRMAN. When they are fishing offshore this water privilege
does not interfere with them, does it?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes; it interferes, except in the case of Government
lands; there it is open to the natives.
The CHAIRMAN. There must be some limit to this right. Is it three
miles?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. I think that would be the limit, the international
limit.
The CHAIRMAN. YOU do not know about that?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. NO.
The CHAIRMAN. In this way the Chinese and Hawaiians have what
we term a practical monopoly of the fishing industry, and will not fish
unless the market price justifies them in going out?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes; that is the case with the Hawaiians; but
the Chinese do not stop at all, they fish right along.
The CHAIRMAN. Around the islands other than Oahu is this fishing
carried on by the natives?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes; principally by the natives, because there is
no market on the other islands.
The CHAIRMAN. What I want to get at is whether fishing in combination
with the taro is the real, substantial food support of the common
people of Hawaii?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes.
The CHAIRMAN. Taro supplies the want for vegetable food?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes.
The CHAIRMAN. And takes the place of bread?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes. I was going to say in regard to the natives,
to show their indolence in regard to their crop, I have found it the case
that the natives have leased out their taro patch to a Chinaman, and
the Chinaman has worked it and paid the Hawaiian in taro, and still
made a living off it himself. I have seen it many times.
The CHAIRMAN. Do the women in Hawaii work in the taro patches?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes; but the men mostly. It is a crop easily
taken care of.
The CHAIRMAN. Easily raised?
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 879
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Easily raised. Of course, there must be an abundance
of water—it grows in a pond; it must be flooded with water.
The CHAIRMAN. Have you, prior to January 17, 1893, been in any
way engaged in the political affairs of Hawaii?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. Yes.
The CHAIRMAN. Have you been in any office there?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. NO.
The CHAIRMAN. Your connection with it then was as a private
citizen?
Mr. MCCANDLESS. It was as a private citizen—to help right wrongs.
The CHAIRMAN. We will suspend the examination of Mr. McCandless,
for the purpose of hearing Mr. Stevens, who, I am informed, is
not well and is desirous of returning to his home.
SWORN STATEMENT OF MR. JOHN L. STEVENS.
The CHAIRMAN. What is your age?
Mr. STEVENS. Seventy-three.
The CHAIRMAN. Your place of nativity?
Mr. STEVENS. Mount Vernon, Me.
The CHAIRMAN. When did you first go to Hawaii?
Mr. STEVENS. I arrived there in September, 1889.
The CHAIRMAN. Was that your first visit?
Mr. STEVENS. My first visit to Hawaii.
The CHAIRMAN. You went as Minister of the United States to that
Government?
Mr. STEVENS. I did.
The CHAIRMAN. Who was then the sovereign?
Mr. STEVENS. King Kalakaua was the sovereign.
The CHAIRMAN. Under what administration were you sent there?
Mr. STEVENS. By President Harrison.
The CHAIRMAN. Were you present at the time Liliuokalani succeeded
to the regal authority in the Hawaiian Islands?
Mr. STEVENS. I was.
The CHAIRMAN. And you remained there until what time—what
time did you leave the islands?
Mr. STEVENS. The 24th of May, 1893.
The CHAIRMAN. Proceed and state what you know of your own
personal knowledge in respect of the political affairs of Hawaii since
your arrival there, the changes in political conditions, the circumstances
that led to such changes, the effects produced by such changes;
and we wish you to state also what participation you had at any time
during your residence there in promoting the interests or welfare of
any political party connected with the Queen's Government or opposed
to the Queen's Government. When you shall have made your statement,
or at any time while yon are making it, the members of the
committee will interpose such questions as they may desire, for the
purpose of keeping your attention to the testimony we desire to elicit.
Mr. STEVENS. Mr. Chairman and gentlemen, I will, of course, be
under the necessity of condensing so far as possible. That inquiry
might require a volume; but, of course, I understand the committee
desires the salient facts. I will read what I think is better than I could
verbally state, and we will have before us the events beginning twelve
days prior to the overthrow of Liliuokalani. 1 can read of events prior
to that; but I think I had better take twelve days prior.

Template:878-879 - Revision history

Jere Krischel at 03:26, 23 December 2005

Jere Krischel at 04:53, 12 December 2005