Difference between revisions of "Template:1034-1035"

From TheMorganReport
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1034 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
+
{{p|1034}}
further information, said that when he came to have further intercourse
+
 
with the people he thought differently of Mr. Neuinan.
+
further information, said that when he came to have  
Mr. BOWEN. 1 am very glad he did. He was a devoted friend of
+
further intercourse with
the Queen.
+
the people he thought differently of Mr. Neuman.
Senator FEYE. Then he would not have cheated her?
+
 
Mr. BOWEN. No; he thought this the best plan. And if it had
+
Mr. BOWEN.   I am very glad he did. He was a devoted  
taken place, there would have been a saving of all the subsequent
+
friend of the Queen.
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Then he would not have cheated her?
 +
 
 +
Mr. BOWEN.   No; he thought this the best plan. And  
 +
if it had taken place,
 +
there would have been a saving of all the subsequent  
 
trouble.
 
trouble.
Senator FRYE. IS there anything else in the report to which you
+
 
desire to call attention?
+
Senator FRYE.   Is there anything else in the report  
Mr. BOWEN. Nothing, except to say that I did not represent myself
+
to which you desire to
as being there in a diplomatic capacity; that 1 was there simply as I
+
call attention?  
have represented to this committee—as a journalist. Mr. Blount
+
 
states that in his report. I was not conducting any annexation propaganda;
+
Mr. BOWEN.   Nothing, except to say that I did not  
I had no such purpose; and Mr. Sewall took no part in the
+
represent myself as being
matter, and knew practically nothing about it.
+
there in a diplomatic capacity; that I was there  
Senator FRYE. Are there any facts connected with the affairs of the
+
simply as I have
 +
represented to this committee---- as a journalist.   Mr.  
 +
Blount states that in
 +
his report. I was not conducting any annexation  
 +
propaganda; I had no such
 +
purpose; and Mr. Sewall took no part in the matter,  
 +
and knew practically
 +
nothing about it.  
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Are there any facts connected with the  
 +
affairs of the
 
Hawaiian Islands which you desire to state?
 
Hawaiian Islands which you desire to state?
Mr. BOWEN. Only impressions. ' I was not there during the revolution.
+
 
I was informed by numbers of the Provisional Government, in
+
Mr. BOWEN.   Only impressions. I was not there during  
response to questions, that the American minister did not conspire to
+
the revolution. I
overthrow the Queen. I was informed that he did practically as he
+
was informed by numbers of the Provisional Government,  
has stated in his own report. I was told so under certain circumstances
+
in response to
and there was no reason for deceiving me.
+
questions, that the American minister did not conspire  
Senator FRYE. Did Paul Neuman make any claim that the minister
+
to overthrow the
interfered to destroy the royal government?
+
Queen. I was informed that he did practically as he  
Mr. BOWEN. He did not. Paul Neuman is a good-natured man, personally
+
has stated in his own
not prejudiced against anybody, that is, individuals; but he
+
report. I was told so under certain circumstances and
disliked the so-called "Missionary Party" there and the Annexation
+
there was no reason
Party, and he included Mr. Stevens among them. Paul Neuman was
+
for deceiving me.  
always consistent. He was always a friend of the Queen, and he was
+
 
head and shoulders intellectually above any others of her supporters.
+
Senator FRYE.   Did Paul Neuman make any claim that  
He was intelligent enough to form opinions during his stay here in
+
the minister interfered
Washington, and to see that there were great difficulties in the way of
+
to destroy the royal government?
restoration; and while he did not commit himself to me on the subject,
+
 
he thought that this course for pensioning the Queen would be the best
+
Mr. BOWEN.   He did not. Paul Neuman is a good-natured  
for all concerned.
+
man, personally not
SWORN STATEMENT OF M. STALKER—Continued.
+
prejudiced against anybody, that is, individuals; but  
Senator GRAY. Tou have already been sworn, and you have read
+
he disliked the
over your testimony given the other day. Have you any special correction
+
so-called "Missionary Party" there and the Annexation  
to make ?
+
Party, and he included
Mr. STALKER. NO; nothing special.
+
Mr. Stevens among them. Paul Neuman was always
Senator GRAY. There was another point about which you spoke to
+
consistent. He was always a
me after having read over your testimony. It was in regard to a question
+
friend of the Queen, and he was head and shoulders  
that had been asked you, a point which you had touched upon,
+
intellectually above any
as to impressions which you derived from those who were supporters
+
others of her supporters. He was intelligent enough to  
of the Provisional Government. In regard to the impression
+
form opinions during
that prevailed with regard to the ability of the supporters of the Provisional
+
his stay here in Washington, and to see that there  
Government to maintain themselves without the aid of the
+
were great difficulties
United States troops. Have you anything more to Bay on that subject?
+
in the way of restoration; and while he did not commit  
Mr. STALKEE. I did receive the impression from that source that
+
himself to me on the
the Provisional Government would not have been able to maintain
+
subject, he thought that this course for pensioning  
AWAIIAN ISLANDS. 1035
+
the Queen would be the
itself and keep its supporters, or, rather, its defenders, together without
+
best for all concerned.
 +
 
 +
SWORN STATEMENT OF M. STALKER---- Continued.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY.   You have already been sworn, and you  
 +
have read over your
 +
testimony given the other day. Have you any special  
 +
correction to make?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   No; nothing special.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY.   There was another point about which  
 +
you spoke to me after
 +
having read over your testimony. It was in regard to  
 +
a question that had
 +
been asked you, a point which you had touched upon, as
 +
to impressions which
 +
you derived from those who were supporters of the  
 +
Provisional Government.
 +
In regard to the impression that prevailed with regard  
 +
to the ability of the
 +
supporters of the Provisional Government to maintain  
 +
themselves without the
 +
aid of the United States troops. Have you anything  
 +
more to say on that
 +
subject?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   I did receive the impression from that  
 +
source that the
 +
Provisional Government would not have been able to  
 +
maintain
 +
 
 +
{{p|1035}}
 +
 
 +
itself and keep its supporters, or, rather, its  
 +
defenders, together without
 
the cooperation of the United States troops.
 
the cooperation of the United States troops.
Senator GRAY. Do you mean that you gathered that impression from
+
 
those who were favorable to or supporters of the Provisional Government?
+
Senator GRAY.   Do you mean that you gathered that  
Mr. STALKEE. Yes.
+
impression from those who
Senator GEAY. Was the impression gathered that the movement
+
were favorable to or supporters of the Provisional  
they made depended on the presence of those troops for encouragement,
+
Government?
morally or otherwise?
+
 
Mr. STALKEE. I can not say that I was told that the original movement
+
Mr. STALKER.   Yes.
depended upon the presence of the troops, but rather their ability
+
 
to maintain their hold without the presence of the troops after it had
+
Senator GRAY.   Was the impression gathered that the  
been acquired.
+
movement they made
Senator GEAY. It was with reference to that?
+
depended on the presence of those troops for  
Mr. STALKEE. Yes; with reference to that, especially.
+
encouragement, morally or
Senator GEAY. Is there any other point on which you wish to be
+
otherwise?  
more explicit?
+
 
Mr. STALKEE. I might say that I received these statements definitely
+
Mr. STALKER.   I can not say that I was told that the  
from one or two members of the Provisional Government, or, at least,
+
original movement
active supporters and cooperators.
+
depended upon the presence of the troops, but rather  
Senator GEAY. Will you be good enough to state what opinion or
+
their ability to
impression you got when you went there as to the ability of the existing
+
maintain their hold without the presence of the troops  
Government to maintain peace and order and protect life and property?
+
after it had been
Mr. STALKEE. I never heard that fact called in question.
+
acquired.  
Senator GEAY. YOU mean the fact of the ability of the Government?
+
 
Mr. STALKEE. The fact of the ability of the existing Government to
+
Senator GRAY.   It was with reference to that?
maintain order and protect life and property. In fact, I have heard it
+
 
repeated by citizens of the country, without respect entirely to their
+
Mr. STALKER.   Yes; with reference to that,  
political affiliations, that there is no part of the civilized world where
+
especially.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY.   Is there any other point on which you  
 +
wish to be more
 +
explicit?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   I might say that I received these  
 +
statements definitely from
 +
one or two members of the Provisional Government, or,  
 +
at least, active
 +
supporters and cooperators.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY.   Will you be good enough to state what  
 +
opinion or impression
 +
you got when you went there as to the ability of the  
 +
existing Government to
 +
maintain peace and order and protect life and  
 +
property?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   I never heard that fact called in  
 +
question.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY.   You mean the fact of the ability of  
 +
the Government?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   The fact of the ability of the existing  
 +
Government to
 +
maintain order and protect life and property.   In  
 +
fact, I have heard it
 +
repeated by citizens of the country, without respect  
 +
entirely to their
 +
political affiliations, that there is no part of the  
 +
civilized world where
 
life and property were so secure as in that country.
 
life and property were so secure as in that country.
Senator GEAY. Would that tally with your own observation during
+
 
the weeks that you were there before this revolution ?
+
Senator GRAY.   Would that tally with your own  
Mr. STALKEE. Yes; I think it would.
+
observation during the weeks
Senator GEAY. Was there any evidence of any disorder up to the
+
that you were there before this revolution?
landing of troops on that Monday, the 16th of January—any disorder
+
 
or feeling of insecurity?
+
Mr. STALKER.   Yes; I think it would.
Mr. STALKEE. None whatever that I observed.
+
 
Senator FEYE. What are you professor of?
+
Senator GRAY. Was there any evidence of any disorder  
Mr. STALKEE. I am professor of veterinary science.
+
up to the landing of
Senator FEYE. Veterinary surgeon?
+
troops on that Monday, the 16th of January---- any
Mr. STALKER. Yes.
+
disorder or feeling of
Senator FEYE. Where did you live when you were in the islands?
+
insecurity?  
Mr. STALKEE. At the Hawaiian Hotel?
+
 
Senator FEYE. That is the royalist hotel?
+
Mr. STALKER.   None whatever that I observed.
Mr. STALKEE. Yes.
+
 
Senator FEYE. Did Mr. English live there at the same time?
+
Senator FRYE.   What are you professor of?
Mr. STALKEE. Yes.
+
 
Senator FEYE. Were you and Mr. English on intimate terms?
+
Mr. STALKER.   I am professor of veterinary science.
Mr. STALKEE. No.
+
 
Senator FEYE. You were not?
+
Senator FRYE.   Veterinary surgeon?
Mr. STALKEE. I can not say that we were.
+
 
Senator FEYE. Did you not have daily conversations with him?
+
Mr. STALKER.   Yes.
Mr. STALKEE. No.
+
 
Senator FEYE. Did you not ultimately suggest to him that he come
+
Senator FRYE.   Where did you live when you were in  
over and become a professor in the college where you were?
+
the islands?
0
+
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   At the Hawaiian Hotel?
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   That is the royalist hotel?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   Yes.
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Did Mr. English live there at the same  
 +
time?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   Yes.
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Were you and Mr. English on intimate  
 +
terms?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   No.  
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   You were not?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   I can not say that we were.
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Did you not have daily conversations  
 +
with him?
 +
 
 +
Mr. STALKER.   No.  
 +
 
 +
Senator FRYE.   Did you not ultimately suggest to him  
 +
that he come over and
 +
become a professor in the college where you were?

Revision as of 03:36, 4 February 2006

-p1034-

further information, said that when he came to have further intercourse with the people he thought differently of Mr. Neuman.

Mr. BOWEN. I am very glad he did. He was a devoted friend of the Queen.

Senator FRYE. Then he would not have cheated her?

Mr. BOWEN. No; he thought this the best plan. And if it had taken place, there would have been a saving of all the subsequent trouble.

Senator FRYE. Is there anything else in the report to which you desire to call attention?

Mr. BOWEN. Nothing, except to say that I did not represent myself as being there in a diplomatic capacity; that I was there simply as I have represented to this committee---- as a journalist. Mr. Blount states that in his report. I was not conducting any annexation propaganda; I had no such purpose; and Mr. Sewall took no part in the matter, and knew practically nothing about it.

Senator FRYE. Are there any facts connected with the affairs of the Hawaiian Islands which you desire to state?

Mr. BOWEN. Only impressions. I was not there during the revolution. I was informed by numbers of the Provisional Government, in response to questions, that the American minister did not conspire to overthrow the Queen. I was informed that he did practically as he has stated in his own report. I was told so under certain circumstances and there was no reason for deceiving me.

Senator FRYE. Did Paul Neuman make any claim that the minister interfered to destroy the royal government?

Mr. BOWEN. He did not. Paul Neuman is a good-natured man, personally not prejudiced against anybody, that is, individuals; but he disliked the so-called "Missionary Party" there and the Annexation Party, and he included Mr. Stevens among them. Paul Neuman was always consistent. He was always a friend of the Queen, and he was head and shoulders intellectually above any others of her supporters. He was intelligent enough to form opinions during his stay here in Washington, and to see that there were great difficulties in the way of restoration; and while he did not commit himself to me on the subject, he thought that this course for pensioning the Queen would be the best for all concerned.

SWORN STATEMENT OF M. STALKER---- Continued.

Senator GRAY. You have already been sworn, and you have read over your testimony given the other day. Have you any special correction to make?

Mr. STALKER. No; nothing special.

Senator GRAY. There was another point about which you spoke to me after having read over your testimony. It was in regard to a question that had been asked you, a point which you had touched upon, as to impressions which you derived from those who were supporters of the Provisional Government. In regard to the impression that prevailed with regard to the ability of the supporters of the Provisional Government to maintain themselves without the aid of the United States troops. Have you anything more to say on that subject?

Mr. STALKER. I did receive the impression from that source that the Provisional Government would not have been able to maintain

-p1035-

itself and keep its supporters, or, rather, its defenders, together without the cooperation of the United States troops.

Senator GRAY. Do you mean that you gathered that impression from those who were favorable to or supporters of the Provisional Government?

Mr. STALKER. Yes.

Senator GRAY. Was the impression gathered that the movement they made depended on the presence of those troops for encouragement, morally or otherwise?

Mr. STALKER. I can not say that I was told that the original movement depended upon the presence of the troops, but rather their ability to maintain their hold without the presence of the troops after it had been acquired.

Senator GRAY. It was with reference to that?

Mr. STALKER. Yes; with reference to that, especially.

Senator GRAY. Is there any other point on which you wish to be more explicit?

Mr. STALKER. I might say that I received these statements definitely from one or two members of the Provisional Government, or, at least, active supporters and cooperators.

Senator GRAY. Will you be good enough to state what opinion or impression you got when you went there as to the ability of the existing Government to maintain peace and order and protect life and property?

Mr. STALKER. I never heard that fact called in question.

Senator GRAY. You mean the fact of the ability of the Government?

Mr. STALKER. The fact of the ability of the existing Government to maintain order and protect life and property. In fact, I have heard it repeated by citizens of the country, without respect entirely to their political affiliations, that there is no part of the civilized world where life and property were so secure as in that country.

Senator GRAY. Would that tally with your own observation during the weeks that you were there before this revolution?

Mr. STALKER. Yes; I think it would.

Senator GRAY. Was there any evidence of any disorder up to the landing of troops on that Monday, the 16th of January---- any disorder or feeling of insecurity?

Mr. STALKER. None whatever that I observed.

Senator FRYE. What are you professor of?

Mr. STALKER. I am professor of veterinary science.

Senator FRYE. Veterinary surgeon?

Mr. STALKER. Yes.

Senator FRYE. Where did you live when you were in the islands?

Mr. STALKER. At the Hawaiian Hotel?

Senator FRYE. That is the royalist hotel?

Mr. STALKER. Yes.

Senator FRYE. Did Mr. English live there at the same time?

Mr. STALKER. Yes.

Senator FRYE. Were you and Mr. English on intimate terms?

Mr. STALKER. No.

Senator FRYE. You were not?

Mr. STALKER. I can not say that we were.

Senator FRYE. Did you not have daily conversations with him?

Mr. STALKER. No.

Senator FRYE. Did you not ultimately suggest to him that he come over and become a professor in the college where you were?