Difference between revisions of "Template:1150-1151"

From TheMorganReport
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1150 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
+
{{p|1150}}
The CHAIRMAN. I conhl not sny that I am familiar.
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. There is a reef that runs around tlie island, and
+
The CHAIRMAN. I could not say that I am familiar.
wherever tliere is a stream of fresh water coming down from the hill
+
 
it cuts a channel—the coral will not grow, and that has left that little
+
Mr. LUDLOW. There is a reef that runs around the
pocket in there. It is very small.
+
island, and wherever there
The CHAIRMAN. How many ships of war could harbor there1?
+
is a stream of fresh water coming down from the hill  
Mr. LUDLOW. Tliere is not room enough for a ship to swing at anchor.
+
it cuts a channel---- the
The CHAIRMAN. HOW far from the line of the bay are the elevations
+
coral will not grow, and that has left that little  
that surround Honolulu?
+
pocket in there. It is
Mr. LUDLOW. The first one is the hill called the Punch Bowl, an
+
very small.  
extinct volcano, that lies behind the town a mile and a quarter or a
+
 
mile and a half from the water. It runs down to a flat plain on the
+
The CHAIRMAN. How many ships of war could harbor  
edge of the water with this coral reef.
+
there?
The CHAIRMAN. Could not guns be placed on the hills in such position
+
 
and with such range as would enable those maintaining them there
+
Mr. LUDLOW. There is not room enough for a ship to  
to keep a fleet off?
+
swing at anchor.
Mr. LUDLOW. If the fleet fired to destroy the town, they would not
+
 
pay much attention to the batteries up there. And it would not be a
+
The CHAIRMAN. How far from the line of the bay are  
difficult matter to hit the town.
+
the elevations that
The CHAIRMAN. I suppose, therefore, you think that men-of-war
+
surround Honolulu?  
that might be in the bay for repairs and for provisions or coal would
+
 
not be made secure by fortifications around the harbor?
+
Mr. LUDLOW. The first one is the hill called the  
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not for Honolulu. It would be a very great
+
Punch Bowl, an extinct
expense building forts outside. I do not think it could be done; it
+
volcano, that lies behind the town a mile and a  
 +
quarter or a mile and a half
 +
from the water. It runs down to a flat plain on the  
 +
edge of the water with
 +
this coral reef.  
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. Could not guns be placed on the hills  
 +
in such position and
 +
with such range as would enable those maintaining them  
 +
there to keep a fleet
 +
off?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. If the fleet fired to destroy the town,  
 +
they would not pay much
 +
attention to the batteries up there. And it would not  
 +
be a difficult matter
 +
to hit the town.  
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. I suppose, therefore, you think that  
 +
men-of-war that might be
 +
in the bay for repairs and for provisions or coal  
 +
would not be made secure
 +
by fortifications around the harbor?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not for Honolulu. It would be a very  
 +
great expense building
 +
forts outside. I do not think it could be done; it  
 
would not be practicable.
 
would not be practicable.
The CHAIRMAN. HOW would it be in Pearl Harbor?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. There you have different conditions. The harbor is
+
The CHAIRMAN. How would it be in Pearl Harbor?
very deep inside and it runs a good ways back. I think it must run
+
 
5 or 6 miles back in toward the center of the island.
+
Mr. LUDLOW. There you have different conditions. The  
The CHAIRMAN. It also has tongues of land running out into it?
+
harbor is very deep
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes—side bays. But most of it is quite deep, and that,
+
inside and it runs a good ways back. I think it must  
with the range of modern artillery on board ship, make it pretty warm
+
run 5 or 6 miles back
for anybody inside there.
+
in toward the center of the island.
The CHAIRMAN. It is what the naval officers would call a well-sheltered
+
 
place?
+
The CHAIRMAN. It also has tongues of land running out  
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes. There is a good deal of work to be done to make
+
into it?
it available. My recollection is that something like a quarter to a half
+
 
mile of excavations would be necessary. Whether that is sand or coral
+
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes---- side bays. But most of it is quite  
we do not know; there have not been any borings.
+
deep, and that, with
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose it is coral. Is that difficult to excavate
+
the range of modern artillery on board ship, make it  
under water?
+
pretty warm for anybody
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not nowadays, with modern dredging.
+
inside there.  
The CHAIRMAN. And once excavated, it is easy to keep it open?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. You can keep it open very readily, I think, as soon as
+
The CHAIRMAN. It is what the naval officers would  
they get the mouth of Honolulu Harbor cleared out. This plant belongs
+
call a well-sheltered
to the Government, and they are going to send it down to Pearl Harbor;
+
place?  
that was the intention when I left there—to see if they can not deepen
+
 
the mouth of it. There is one thing to be said about it, it would make
+
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes. There is a good deal of work to be  
another port there for the people of Honolulu and would throw cut
+
done to make it
some of those who are in business, because it would make a better
+
available. My recollection is that something like a  
harbor than at Honolulu.
+
quarter to a half mile
The CHAIRMAN. If you were putting the steamer Boston to sea for a
+
of excavations would be necessary. Whether that is  
voyage into the Pacific Ocean and back around Cape Horn, could you
+
sand or coral we do not
carry coal enough on the Boston to reach Australia and back to the
+
know; there have not been any borings.
mouth of the Chesapeake?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. NO.
+
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose it is coral. Is that difficult  
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 1151
+
to excavate under
The CHAIRMAN. How far would you be able to steam with the coal
+
water?  
you could carry on the Boston ?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. I never served on the Boston; I could only give you
+
Mr. LUDLOW. No; not nowadays, with modern dredging.
my impression. I do not think her steaming radius is over 3,500 miles.
+
 
She is one of the old type of ships.
+
The CHAIRMAN. And once excavated, it is easy to keep  
The CHAIRMAN. Take the best of modern ships—cruisers which
+
it open?
have large capacity for carrying coal, and built purposely for that.
+
 
What is the steaming radius of those ships?
+
Mr. LUDLOW. You can keep it open very readily, I  
Mr. LUDLOW. Probably the steaming radius of the Columbia is the
+
think, as soon as they get
largest. My impression is that at her most economical speed she has
+
the mouth of Honolulu Harbor cleared out. This plant  
something like 10,000 miles. The Philadelphia has probably 0,000 miles,
+
belongs to the
and the San Francisco has probably 5,000.
+
Government, and they are going to send it down to  
The CHAIRMAN. That means 5,000 miles out and back?
+
Pearl Harbor; that was the
Mr. LUDLOW. Five thousand miles alone.
+
intention when I left there---- to see if they can not  
The CHAIRMAN. YOU could not take either of those ships from the
+
deepen the mouth of it.
mouth of the Chesapeake Bay around to San Francisco, and when you
+
There is one thing to be said about it, it would make  
arrived there have them in fighting condition?
+
another port there for
Mr. LUDLOW. No; you would have to stop on the way.
+
the people of Honolulu and would throw out some of  
The CHAIRMAN. Where would you stop ?
+
those who are in
Mr. LUDLOW. In time of peace?
+
business, because it would make a better harbor than  
The CHAIRMAN. Any time.
+
at Honolulu.
Mr. LUDLOW. We have any number of stations—a dozen or more
+
 
coaling commercial stations all through the West Indies; Pernambuco,
+
The CHAIRMAN. If you were putting the steamer ''Boston''
Brazil; Bahia, Eio Janeiro, Montevideo, and Sandy Point,
+
to sea for a voyage
Straits of Magellan, and Callao; and also Panama and Valparaiso.
+
into the Pacific Ocean and back around Cape Horn,  
The CHAIRMAN. At Valparaiso you would find coal?
+
could you carry coal
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes; and at Callao.
+
enough on the ''Boston'' to reach Australia and back to  
The CHAIRMAN. In time of war you could not obtain coal supplies
+
the mouth of the
for the naval vessels?
+
Chesapeake?  
Mr. LUDLOW. I believe coal is contraband.
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. SO that in time of war if you wanted to carry coal
+
Mr. LUDLOW. No.  
for the best cruiser you have from Chesapeake Bay to San Francisco,
+
 
you.would not find her in fighting trim when you got to San Francisco?
+
{{p|1151}}
Mr. LUDLOW. No.
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. Do you not think that under such circumstances it
+
The CHAIRMAN. How far would you be able to steam with  
would be of advantage to the United States to have at some point in
+
the coal you could
the Pacific, away from our coast, places where we have the right of
+
carry on the ''Boston?''
control, and places where we could protect our coal supplies?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. I see what you are leading up to. We could not reach
+
Mr. LUDLOW. I never served on the ''Boston''; I could  
Honolulu.
+
only give you my
The CHAIRMAN. We could reach Samoa, could we not?
+
impression. I do not think her steaming radius is  
Mr. LUDLOW. NO.
+
over 3,500 miles. She is
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose we were already at Samoa and at Honolulu
+
one of the old type of ships.
and had our supplies, and we had to combat with the ships that
+
 
would come from the Mediterranean and around the Horn for the purpose
+
The CHAIRMAN. Take the best of modern ships---- cruisers
of attacking the coast of California, which country would have
+
which have large
the advantage in a military sense in such an arrangement as that?
+
capacity for carrying coal, and built purposely for  
Mr. LUDLOW. Samoa would have to be counted out. It is over 6,000
+
that. What is the
miles from there, and we are 2,000 miles from Honolulu.
+
steaming radius of those ships?
The CHAIRMAN. My question is that we are already in possession of
+
 
Samoa and Honolulu, and we have sufficient coal there to supply any
+
Mr. LUDLOW. Probably the steaming radius of the  
emergency whatever. Then the question would be, having the right
+
''Columbia'' is the largest.
to coal your ships at those points, and protecting them and protecting
+
My impression is that at her most economical speed she  
your depot of supplies, would you have an advantage over a maritime
+
has something like
power that had to cross the Atlantic and come around the Horn, or
+
10,000 miles.   The ''Philadelphia'' has probably 6,000  
 +
miles, and the ''San Francisco'' has probably 5,000.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. That means 5,000 miles out and back?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. Five thousand miles alone.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. You could not take either of those  
 +
ships from the mouth of
 +
the Chesapeake Bay around to San Francisco, and when  
 +
you arrived there have
 +
them in fighting condition?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. No; you would have to stop on the way.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. Where would you stop?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. In time of peace?
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. Any time.
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. We have any number of stations---- a dozen or  
 +
more coaling
 +
commercial stations all through the West Indies;  
 +
Pernambuco, Brazil; Bahia,
 +
Rio Janeiro, Montevideo, and Sandy Point, Straits of  
 +
Magellan, and Callao;
 +
and also Panama and Valparaiso.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. At Valparaiso you would find coal?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes; and at Callao.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. In time of war you could not obtain  
 +
coal supplies for the
 +
naval vessels?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. I believe coal is contraband.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. So that in time of war if you wanted to  
 +
carry coal for the
 +
best cruiser you have from Chesapeake Bay to San  
 +
Francisco, you would not
 +
find her in fighting trim when you got to San  
 +
Francisco?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. No.  
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. Do you not think that under such  
 +
circumstances it would be of
 +
advantage to the United States to have at some point  
 +
in the Pacific, away
 +
from our coast, places where we have the right of  
 +
control, and places where
 +
we could protect our coal supplies?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. I see what you are leading up to. We  
 +
could not reach Honolulu.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. We could reach Samoa, could we not?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. No.  
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. Suppose we were already at Samoa and at  
 +
Honolulu and had our
 +
supplies, and we had to combat with the ships that  
 +
would come from the
 +
Mediterranean and around the Horn for the purpose of
 +
attacking the coast of
 +
California, which country would have the advantage in  
 +
a military sense in
 +
such an arrangement as that?
 +
 
 +
Mr. LUDLOW. Samoa would have to be counted out. It is  
 +
over 6,000 miles from
 +
there, and we are 2,000 miles from Honolulu.
 +
 
 +
The CHAIRMAN. My question is that we are already in  
 +
possession of Samoa and
 +
Honolulu, and we have sufficient coal there to supply  
 +
any emergency
 +
whatever. Then the question would be, having the  
 +
right to coal your ships
 +
at those points, and protecting them and protecting  
 +
your depot of supplies,
 +
would you have an advantage over a maritime power that  
 +
had to cross the
 +
Atlantic and come around the Horn, or

Revision as of 10:24, 8 February 2006

-p1150-

The CHAIRMAN. I could not say that I am familiar.

Mr. LUDLOW. There is a reef that runs around the island, and wherever there is a stream of fresh water coming down from the hill it cuts a channel---- the coral will not grow, and that has left that little pocket in there. It is very small.

The CHAIRMAN. How many ships of war could harbor there?

Mr. LUDLOW. There is not room enough for a ship to swing at anchor.

The CHAIRMAN. How far from the line of the bay are the elevations that surround Honolulu?

Mr. LUDLOW. The first one is the hill called the Punch Bowl, an extinct volcano, that lies behind the town a mile and a quarter or a mile and a half from the water. It runs down to a flat plain on the edge of the water with this coral reef.

The CHAIRMAN. Could not guns be placed on the hills in such position and with such range as would enable those maintaining them there to keep a fleet off?

Mr. LUDLOW. If the fleet fired to destroy the town, they would not pay much attention to the batteries up there. And it would not be a difficult matter to hit the town.

The CHAIRMAN. I suppose, therefore, you think that men-of-war that might be in the bay for repairs and for provisions or coal would not be made secure by fortifications around the harbor?

Mr. LUDLOW. No; not for Honolulu. It would be a very great expense building forts outside. I do not think it could be done; it would not be practicable.

The CHAIRMAN. How would it be in Pearl Harbor?

Mr. LUDLOW. There you have different conditions. The harbor is very deep inside and it runs a good ways back. I think it must run 5 or 6 miles back in toward the center of the island.

The CHAIRMAN. It also has tongues of land running out into it?

Mr. LUDLOW. Yes---- side bays. But most of it is quite deep, and that, with the range of modern artillery on board ship, make it pretty warm for anybody inside there.

The CHAIRMAN. It is what the naval officers would call a well-sheltered place?

Mr. LUDLOW. Yes. There is a good deal of work to be done to make it available. My recollection is that something like a quarter to a half mile of excavations would be necessary. Whether that is sand or coral we do not know; there have not been any borings.

The CHAIRMAN. Suppose it is coral. Is that difficult to excavate under water?

Mr. LUDLOW. No; not nowadays, with modern dredging.

The CHAIRMAN. And once excavated, it is easy to keep it open?

Mr. LUDLOW. You can keep it open very readily, I think, as soon as they get the mouth of Honolulu Harbor cleared out. This plant belongs to the Government, and they are going to send it down to Pearl Harbor; that was the intention when I left there---- to see if they can not deepen the mouth of it. There is one thing to be said about it, it would make another port there for the people of Honolulu and would throw out some of those who are in business, because it would make a better harbor than at Honolulu.

The CHAIRMAN. If you were putting the steamer Boston to sea for a voyage into the Pacific Ocean and back around Cape Horn, could you carry coal enough on the Boston to reach Australia and back to the mouth of the Chesapeake?

Mr. LUDLOW. No.

-p1151-

The CHAIRMAN. How far would you be able to steam with the coal you could carry on the Boston?

Mr. LUDLOW. I never served on the Boston; I could only give you my impression. I do not think her steaming radius is over 3,500 miles. She is one of the old type of ships.

The CHAIRMAN. Take the best of modern ships---- cruisers which have large capacity for carrying coal, and built purposely for that. What is the steaming radius of those ships?

Mr. LUDLOW. Probably the steaming radius of the Columbia is the largest. My impression is that at her most economical speed she has something like 10,000 miles. The Philadelphia has probably 6,000 miles, and the San Francisco has probably 5,000.

The CHAIRMAN. That means 5,000 miles out and back?

Mr. LUDLOW. Five thousand miles alone.

The CHAIRMAN. You could not take either of those ships from the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay around to San Francisco, and when you arrived there have them in fighting condition?

Mr. LUDLOW. No; you would have to stop on the way.

The CHAIRMAN. Where would you stop?

Mr. LUDLOW. In time of peace?

The CHAIRMAN. Any time.

Mr. LUDLOW. We have any number of stations---- a dozen or more coaling commercial stations all through the West Indies; Pernambuco, Brazil; Bahia, Rio Janeiro, Montevideo, and Sandy Point, Straits of Magellan, and Callao; and also Panama and Valparaiso.

The CHAIRMAN. At Valparaiso you would find coal?

Mr. LUDLOW. Yes; and at Callao.

The CHAIRMAN. In time of war you could not obtain coal supplies for the naval vessels?

Mr. LUDLOW. I believe coal is contraband.

The CHAIRMAN. So that in time of war if you wanted to carry coal for the best cruiser you have from Chesapeake Bay to San Francisco, you would not find her in fighting trim when you got to San Francisco?

Mr. LUDLOW. No.

The CHAIRMAN. Do you not think that under such circumstances it would be of advantage to the United States to have at some point in the Pacific, away from our coast, places where we have the right of control, and places where we could protect our coal supplies?

Mr. LUDLOW. I see what you are leading up to. We could not reach Honolulu.

The CHAIRMAN. We could reach Samoa, could we not?

Mr. LUDLOW. No.

The CHAIRMAN. Suppose we were already at Samoa and at Honolulu and had our supplies, and we had to combat with the ships that would come from the Mediterranean and around the Horn for the purpose of attacking the coast of California, which country would have the advantage in a military sense in such an arrangement as that?

Mr. LUDLOW. Samoa would have to be counted out. It is over 6,000 miles from there, and we are 2,000 miles from Honolulu.

The CHAIRMAN. My question is that we are already in possession of Samoa and Honolulu, and we have sufficient coal there to supply any emergency whatever. Then the question would be, having the right to coal your ships at those points, and protecting them and protecting your depot of supplies, would you have an advantage over a maritime power that had to cross the Atlantic and come around the Horn, or