Difference between revisions of "Template:1154-1155"

From TheMorganReport
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
H 5 4 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
+
{{p|1154}}
Mr. LUDLOW. Straight across is from 10 to 15 miles.
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Straight across is from 10 to 15 miles.
Senator SHERMAN. Your idea is that in case of war our forces could be
+
 
thrown on the island, and they could practically occupy that island
+
Senator {{sc|Sherman.}} Your idea is that in case of war our  
without regard to the Navy?
+
forces could be
Mr. LUDLOW. They have some ships there, and also naturally they
+
thrown on the island, and they could practically  
would make the best fight they could. But they realize the fact that
+
occupy that island without
war without us would involve all they have to the north of us.
+
regard to the Navy?
Senator SHERMAN. Still, there is no other preparation for defense,
+
 
for any other fort on the island except that?
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} They have some ships there, and also  
Mr. LUDLOW. I never heard of any and do not believe there is.
+
naturally they would make
Senator SHERMAN. IS there any difficulty in landing on the inside?
+
the best fight they could. But they realize the fact  
Mr. LUDLOW. On the inside; no. There are abundant harbors on
+
that war without us
the "West Pacific coast—some very fine harbors in there that have never
+
would involve all they have to the north of us.
been surveyed.
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. Have you mentioned the depot of supplies at
+
Senator {{sc|Sherman.}} Still, there is no other preparation  
Coquimbo?
+
for defense, for any
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes; that is in Peru. That is the southern part of
+
other fort on the island except that?
their squadron. They have a store ship there, and a direct line of
+
 
steamers clear up to Callao.
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} I never heard of any and do not believe  
The CHAIRMAN. IS it Coquimbo or the Esquimalt?
+
there is.
Mr. LUDLOW. Esquimalt is fortified somewhat.
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. Land fortifications?
+
Senator {{sc|Sherman.}} Is there any difficulty in landing  
Mr. LUDLOW. There are some land fortifications there, but not of
+
on the inside?
very great importance. They have a dry dock and can do repairs there.
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. They have not built ships there yet?
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} On the inside; no. There are abundant  
Mr. LUDLOW. Oh, no.
+
harbors on the West
The CHAIRMAN. They have their coal supplies back on the island?
+
Pacific coast-some very fine harbors in there that  
Mr. LUDLOW. Their coal mines are the Nanaimo, which are on the
+
have never been surveyed.
east side of the island of Vancouver, about 00 or 70 miles north of
+
 
Victoria; and, at Departure Bay, the Wellington mines; 50 miles north
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} Have you mentioned the depot of  
is the Comax mine. There is the greatest abundance of coal to thenorth
+
supplies at Coquimbo?
end of the island; it is only a question of opening it up.
+
 
Senator SHERMAN. Does that coal go to San Francisco?
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Yes; that is in Peru. That is the  
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes. So far as I know, it is the only bituminous coal
+
southern part of their
found on the west coast. The coal is of very excellent quality.
+
squadron. They have a store ship there, and a direct  
Senator DOLPH. Are you acquainted with the coal industry in the
+
line of steamers clear
State of Washington?
+
up to Callao.
Mr. LUDLOW. It is this way. For three years I was the lighthouse
+
 
inspector at San Francisco, and in that position I had to buy a great
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} Is it Coquimbo or the Esquimalt?
deal of coal, and I tried all the coal from all the mines that I could
+
 
find in the market in San Francisco.
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Esquimalt is fortified somewhat.
Senator DOLPH. How long ago was that?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. That was in 1887, 1888, 1889, and 1890.
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} Land fortifications?
Senator DOLPH. Are you familiar with the product from the Green
+
 
Biver country, the mines opened by the Central and Southern Pacific?
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} There are some land fortifications there,  
Mr. LUDLOW. In Wyoming?
+
but not of very great
Senator DOLPH. NO; in Washington.
+
importance. They have a dry dock and can do repairs  
Mr. LUDLOW. The Green River in Washington? No; I have not
+
there.
seen those; I did not know there was any on the market.
+
 
Senator DOLPH. DO you know the quality of the coal used by the
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} They have not built ships there yet?
Central and Southern Pacific from mines in Washington east of Tacoma
+
 
and up in the Cascade Mountains?
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Oh, no.
Mr. LUDLOW. 1 have not seen them. They get their coal from Coma
+
 
Vein, Vancouvers Island. They own 30 per cent in those mines, and
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} They have their coal supplies back on  
Dunsmores own 70.
+
the island?
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Their coal mines are the Nanaimo, which  
 +
are on the east side of
 +
the island of Vancouver, about 60 or 70 miles north of  
 +
Victoria; and, at
 +
Departure Bay, the Wellington mines; 50 miles north is
 +
the Comax mine.
 +
There is the greatest abundance of coal to the north
 +
end of the island; it
 +
is only a question of opening it up.
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Sherman.}} Does that coal go to San Francisco?
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Yes. So far as I know, it is the only  
 +
bituminous coal found on
 +
the west coast. The coal is of very excellent  
 +
quality.
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Dolph.}} Are you acquainted with the coal  
 +
industry in the State of
 +
Washington?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} It is this way. For three years I was  
 +
the lighthouse inspector
 +
at San Francisco, and in that position I had to buy a  
 +
great deal of coal,
 +
and I tried all the coal from all the mines that I  
 +
could find in the market
 +
in San Francisco.  
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Dolph.}} How long ago was that?
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} That was in 1887, 1888, 1889, and 1890.
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Dolph.}} Are you familiar with the product from  
 +
the Green River
 +
country, the mines opened by the Central and Southern  
 +
Pacific?
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} In Wyoming?
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Dolph.}} No; in Washington.
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} The Green River in Washington?   No; I  
 +
have not seen those; I
 +
did not know there was any on the market.
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Dolph.}} Do you know the quality of the coal  
 +
used by the Central and
 +
Southern Pacific from mines in Washington east of  
 +
Tacoma and up in the
 +
Cascade Mountains?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} I have not seen them. They get their coal  
 +
from Coma Vein,
 +
Vancouvers Island. They own 30 per cent in those  
 +
mines, and Dunsmores own
 +
70.  
 +
 
 
Adjourned to meet on notice.
 
Adjourned to meet on notice.
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 1155
+
 
WASHINGTON. D. C, Thursday, February 8,1894.
+
{{p|1155}}
 +
={{sc|Washington}}, D. C, ''Thursday, February 8,1894.''==
 +
 
 
The subcommittee met pursuant to notice.
 
The subcommittee met pursuant to notice.
Present: The chairman (Senator Morgan) and Senators Gray and
+
 
Frye.
+
Present: The chairman (Senator Morgan) and Senators Gray and Frye.
Absent: Senators Butler and Sherman.
+
Absent: Senators Butler and Sherman.
SWORN STATEMENT OF NIC0LL LUDLOW—Continued.
+
 
Senator GRAY. YOU have already been sworn ?
+
==SWORN STATEMENT OF NIC0LL LUDLOW-Continued.==
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes.
+
Senator {{sc|Gray.}} You have already been sworn?
Senator GRAY. And you stated in your examination the other day
+
 
that you went to the Sandwich Islands, in command of the Mohican,
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Yes.  
with Admiral Skerrett; that you arrived there on the 10th of February,
+
 
and were there until when?
+
Senator {{sc|Gray.}}  And you stated in your examination the  
Mr. LUDLOW. The 1st of May.
+
other day that you
Senator GRAY. You have already said that you were ashore nearly
+
went to the Sandwich Islands, in command of the  
every day; that as Admiral Skerrett's chief of staff it was your duty
+
''Mohican'', with Admiral
to make a great many social and official calls; that you came in contact
+
Skerrett; that you arrived there on the 10th of  
with the people of those islands, and that you were an interested
+
February, and were there
observer of the condition of things obtaining there. That is so, is it
+
until when?  
not?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes.
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} The 1st of May.
Senator GRAY. Did you, with reference to the revolution of January
+
 
17, 1893, form any opinion from these sources of observation and information
+
Senator {{sc|Gray.}}  You have already said that you were  
as to whether or not that revolution would have been accomplished
+
ashore nearly every day;
when it was accomplished and as it was accomplished if it had
+
that as Admiral Skerrett's chief of staff it was your  
not been for the presence on shore of the United States troops ?
+
duty to make a great
Senator FRYE. DO you consider that a legitimate question?
+
many social and official calls; that you came in  
Senator GRAY. I do.
+
contact with the people of
The CHAIRMAN. I expect Mr. Ludlow had better answer that question.
+
those islands, and that you were an interested  
Mr. LUDLOW. I would like to call attention to a fact in the question.
+
observer of the condition of
The CHAIRMAN. State your opinion about it.
+
things obtaining there. That is so, is it not?
Mr. LUDLOW. The troops were not on shore at the commencement of
+
 
the revolution; that is, something had been done in the way of the revolution
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Yes.  
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Gray.}}  Did you, with reference to the  
 +
revolution of January 17,
 +
1893, form any opinion from these sources of  
 +
observation and information as
 +
to whether or not that revolution would have been  
 +
accomplished when it was
 +
accomplished and as it was accomplished if it had not
 +
been for the presence
 +
on shore of the United States troops??
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Frye.}} Do you consider that a legitimate  
 +
question?
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Gray.}} I do.
 +
 
 +
The {{sc|Chairman.}} I expect Mr. Ludlow had better answer  
 +
that question.
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} I would like to call attention to a fact  
 +
in the question.
 +
 
 +
The {{sc|Chairman.}} State your opinion about it.
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} The troops were not on shore at the  
 +
commencement of the
 +
revolution; that is, something had been done in the  
 +
way of the revolution
 
before the men got ashore.
 
before the men got ashore.
The CHAIRMAN. YOU do not know that of your own knowledge?
+
 
Mr. LUDLOW. NO. The tenor of the Senator's question is what I
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} You do not know that of your own  
heard and what I learned aud saw.
+
knowledge?
The CHAIRMAN. I do not understand that you are asked for all you
+
 
heard and learned; but the question is based upon a hypothesis.
+
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} No. The tenor of the Senator's question  
Senator GRAY. There is no hypothesis about the fact that the revolution,
+
is what I heard and
so-called, occurred on the 17th of January, and, when Capt.
+
what I learned and saw.
Ludlow arrived there, it was still a matter of exceeding and absorbing
+
 
interest and a toiric of conversation among those people. The captain
+
The {{sc|Chairman.}} I do not understand that you are asked  
was ashore and met all classes of people. I now ask him whether he
+
for all you heard and
formed any idea as to whether that revolution would have occurred as
+
learned; but the question is based upon a hypothesis.
it did but for the presence of those United States troops?
+
 
The CHAIRMAN. State whether you think it would have occurred or
+
Senator {{sc|Gray.}}  There is no hypothesis about the fact  
not, and then you may give your sources of information.
+
that the revolution,
Senator GRAY. State categorically one way or the other.
+
so-called, occurred on the 17th of January, and, when  
The CHAIRMAN. It is a matter of opinion. You are asked to state
+
Capt. Ludlow arrived
whether you formed an opinion. Did you form an opinion about it?
+
there, it was still a matter of exceeding and  
Mr. LUDLOW. Yes.
+
absorbing interest and a topic
 +
of conversation among those people. The captain was
 +
ashore and met all
 +
classes of people. I now ask him whether he formed
 +
any idea as to whether
 +
that revolution would have occurred as it did but for  
 +
the presence of those
 +
United States troops?
 +
 
 +
The {{sc|Chairman.}} State whether you think it would have  
 +
occurred or not, and
 +
then you may give your sources of information.
 +
 
 +
Senator {{sc|Gray.}} State categorically one way or the  
 +
other.
 +
 
 +
The {{sc|Chairman.}} It is a matter of opinion. You are  
 +
asked to state whether you
 +
formed an opinion. Did you form an opinion about it?
 +
 
 +
Mr. {{sc|Ludlow.}} Yes.

Latest revision as of 02:43, 11 February 2006

-p1154-

Mr. Ludlow. Straight across is from 10 to 15 miles.

Senator Sherman. Your idea is that in case of war our forces could be thrown on the island, and they could practically occupy that island without regard to the Navy?

Mr. Ludlow. They have some ships there, and also naturally they would make the best fight they could. But they realize the fact that war without us would involve all they have to the north of us.

Senator Sherman. Still, there is no other preparation for defense, for any other fort on the island except that?

Mr. Ludlow. I never heard of any and do not believe there is.

Senator Sherman. Is there any difficulty in landing on the inside?

Mr. Ludlow. On the inside; no. There are abundant harbors on the West Pacific coast-some very fine harbors in there that have never been surveyed.

The Chairman. Have you mentioned the depot of supplies at Coquimbo?

Mr. Ludlow. Yes; that is in Peru. That is the southern part of their squadron. They have a store ship there, and a direct line of steamers clear up to Callao.

The Chairman. Is it Coquimbo or the Esquimalt?

Mr. Ludlow. Esquimalt is fortified somewhat.

The Chairman. Land fortifications?

Mr. Ludlow. There are some land fortifications there, but not of very great importance. They have a dry dock and can do repairs there.

The Chairman. They have not built ships there yet?

Mr. Ludlow. Oh, no.

The Chairman. They have their coal supplies back on the island?

Mr. Ludlow. Their coal mines are the Nanaimo, which are on the east side of the island of Vancouver, about 60 or 70 miles north of Victoria; and, at Departure Bay, the Wellington mines; 50 miles north is the Comax mine. There is the greatest abundance of coal to the north end of the island; it is only a question of opening it up.

Senator Sherman. Does that coal go to San Francisco?

Mr. Ludlow. Yes. So far as I know, it is the only bituminous coal found on the west coast. The coal is of very excellent quality.

Senator Dolph. Are you acquainted with the coal industry in the State of Washington?

Mr. Ludlow. It is this way. For three years I was the lighthouse inspector at San Francisco, and in that position I had to buy a great deal of coal, and I tried all the coal from all the mines that I could find in the market in San Francisco.

Senator Dolph. How long ago was that?

Mr. Ludlow. That was in 1887, 1888, 1889, and 1890.

Senator Dolph. Are you familiar with the product from the Green River country, the mines opened by the Central and Southern Pacific?

Mr. Ludlow. In Wyoming?

Senator Dolph. No; in Washington.

Mr. Ludlow. The Green River in Washington? No; I have not seen those; I did not know there was any on the market.

Senator Dolph. Do you know the quality of the coal used by the Central and Southern Pacific from mines in Washington east of Tacoma and up in the Cascade Mountains?

Mr. Ludlow. I have not seen them. They get their coal from Coma Vein, Vancouvers Island. They own 30 per cent in those mines, and Dunsmores own 70.

Adjourned to meet on notice.

-p1155-

Washington, D. C, Thursday, February 8,1894.=

The subcommittee met pursuant to notice.

Present: The chairman (Senator Morgan) and Senators Gray and Frye. Absent: Senators Butler and Sherman.

SWORN STATEMENT OF NIC0LL LUDLOW-Continued.

Senator Gray. You have already been sworn?

Mr. Ludlow. Yes.

Senator Gray. And you stated in your examination the other day that you went to the Sandwich Islands, in command of the Mohican, with Admiral Skerrett; that you arrived there on the 10th of February, and were there until when?

Mr. Ludlow. The 1st of May.

Senator Gray. You have already said that you were ashore nearly every day; that as Admiral Skerrett's chief of staff it was your duty to make a great many social and official calls; that you came in contact with the people of those islands, and that you were an interested observer of the condition of things obtaining there. That is so, is it not?

Mr. Ludlow. Yes.

Senator Gray. Did you, with reference to the revolution of January 17, 1893, form any opinion from these sources of observation and information as to whether or not that revolution would have been accomplished when it was accomplished and as it was accomplished if it had not been for the presence on shore of the United States troops??

Senator Frye. Do you consider that a legitimate question?

Senator Gray. I do.

The Chairman. I expect Mr. Ludlow had better answer that question.

Mr. Ludlow. I would like to call attention to a fact in the question.

The Chairman. State your opinion about it.

Mr. Ludlow. The troops were not on shore at the commencement of the revolution; that is, something had been done in the way of the revolution before the men got ashore.

The Chairman. You do not know that of your own knowledge?

Mr. Ludlow. No. The tenor of the Senator's question is what I heard and what I learned and saw.

The Chairman. I do not understand that you are asked for all you heard and learned; but the question is based upon a hypothesis.

Senator Gray. There is no hypothesis about the fact that the revolution, so-called, occurred on the 17th of January, and, when Capt. Ludlow arrived there, it was still a matter of exceeding and absorbing interest and a topic of conversation among those people. The captain was ashore and met all classes of people. I now ask him whether he formed any idea as to whether that revolution would have occurred as it did but for the presence of those United States troops?

The Chairman. State whether you think it would have occurred or not, and then you may give your sources of information.

Senator Gray. State categorically one way or the other.

The Chairman. It is a matter of opinion. You are asked to state whether you formed an opinion. Did you form an opinion about it?

Mr. Ludlow. Yes.