Difference between revisions of "Template:1126-1127"

From TheMorganReport
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
1126 HAWAIIAN ISLANDS.
+
{{p|1126}}
Senator GRAY. YOU were on those islands, for the reasons that you
+
 
have described, from what date?
+
Senator GRAY. You were on those islands, for the  
Mr. HOES. From 1893. the 25th of September, 1891, until the 9th of March,
+
reasons that you have
Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become very well
+
described, from what date?
acquainted with the residents of the island ami the people, as you have
+
 
related?
+
Mr. HOES. From the 25th of September, 1891, until the  
Mr. HOES. Yes.
+
9th of March, 1893.
Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable annexation
+
 
sentiment before the emeute of January, 1893?
+
Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become  
Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by the prominent
+
very well acquainted
people there, that annexation was the ultimate solution of the Hawaiian
+
with the residents of the island and the people, as  
question, but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to when that
+
you have related?
event would take place.
+
 
Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the American
+
Mr. HOES. Yes.  
population, so called?
+
 
Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it seemed to be
+
Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable  
generally prevalent.
+
annexation sentiment
Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there?
+
before the emeute of January, 1893?
Mr. HOES. Yes.
+
 
Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the Saturday and
+
Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by  
Monday and Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this revolution,
+
the prominent people
there was a movement for annexation?
+
there, that annexation was the ultimate solution of  
Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared what it was for,
+
the Hawaiian question,
so long as it resulted in the establishment of good government. I
+
but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to  
believe the people reposed such absolute confidence in the committee
+
when that event would
of safety that they would follow them through fire and water.
+
take place.  
Senator GRAY. What people?
+
 
Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order and good
+
Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the  
government.
+
American population,
Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the Provincial
+
so called?  
Government at the time?
+
 
Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion th at started it, and subsequently upheld it.
+
Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it  
Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own observation, that on
+
seemed to be generally
Monday and Tuesday, particularly Tuesday, it was mooted about that
+
prevalent.  
this movement was an annexation movement as a fact?
+
 
Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was.
+
Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there?
Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member of the
+
 
committee of safety and was active in the military operations and has
+
Mr. HOES. Yes.  
testified before the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was
+
 
active in doing, he found that he could not do it until he told them it
+
Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the  
was for annexation to the United States. Have you any knowledge
+
Saturday and Monday and
on that subject?
+
Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this  
Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that talked about at
+
revolution, there was a
that time. The feeling of the people was simply as I have described it.
+
movement for annexation?
It was such an intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed and
+
 
acted in Hawaii, that any solution would have been accepted if advocated
+
Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared  
by the committee of safety.
+
what it was for, so
Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the proclamation of the
+
long as it resulted in the establishment of good  
Provisional Government declared that it would be established until
+
government. I believe the
annexation should be declared between the islands and the United
+
people reposed such absolute confidence in the  
States.
+
committee of safety that they
Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I believe the meaning
+
would follow them through fire and water.
intended by that phrase
+
 
Senator GRAY. DO you not know that Mr. Thurston has always been
+
Senator GRAY. What people?
an ardent annexationist ?
+
 
HAWAIIAN ISLANDS. 1127
+
Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order  
Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many addresses
+
and good government.
in the Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase advocating
+
 
annexation.
+
Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the  
Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the Legislature?
+
Provincial Government at
Mr. HOES. The Legislature was made up of a band of honest men on
+
the time?  
one side, pitted against an unprincipled rabble on the other. Mr.
+
 
Thurston was never afraid to express his honest convictions at any
+
Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion that started it, and  
proper time, or in any fitting place, and, had he so chosen, he would
+
subsequently upheld it.
nave been as willing to advocate annexation in the Legislature as upon
+
 
the public rostrum.
+
Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own  
Senator GRAY. Did you expect him to advocate annexation in their
+
observation, that on Monday
 +
and Tuesday, particularly Tuesday, it was mooted about  
 +
that this movement
 +
was an annexation movement as a fact?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member  
 +
of the committee of
 +
safety and was active in the military operations and  
 +
has testified before
 +
the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was  
 +
active in doing, he
 +
found that he could not do it until he told them it  
 +
was for annexation to
 +
the United States. Have you any knowledge on that  
 +
subject?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that  
 +
talked about at that time.
 +
The feeling of the people was simply as I have  
 +
described it. It was such an
 +
intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed  
 +
and acted in Hawaii,
 +
that any solution would have been accepted if  
 +
advocated by the committee of
 +
safety.  
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the  
 +
proclamation of the
 +
Provisional Government declared that it would be  
 +
established until
 +
annexation should be declared between the islands and  
 +
the United States.
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I  
 +
believe the meaning
 +
intended by that phrase----
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Do you not know that Mr. Thurston has  
 +
always been an ardent
 +
annexationist??
 +
 
 +
{{p|1127}}
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many  
 +
addresses in the
 +
Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase  
 +
advocating annexation.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the  
 
Legislature?
 
Legislature?
Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he seen fit.
+
 
Senator GRAY. Why would he do it?
+
Mr. HOES.  The Legislature was made up of a band of
Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have been in favor
+
honest men on one side,
of annexation thought the time was ripe for it. That leads me to say
+
pitted against an unprincipled rabble on the other. 
that, in my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours previous to
+
Mr. Thurston was never
the prorogation of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event
+
afraid to express his honest convictions at any proper
soon to be consummated never entered the head of any man composing
+
time, or in any
the present Government and its band of officials, not even Thurston's.
+
fitting place, and, had he so chosen, he would nave
Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the course of the
+
been as willing to
revolution, so called, so far as its time is concerned, but after the revolution,
+
advocate annexation in the Legislature as upon the
after the events commenced to shape themselves, did not you
+
public rostrum.
understand that annexation was apart of it?
+
 
Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read by the Provisional
+
Senator GRAY.  Did you expect him to advocate
Government.
+
annexation in their
Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the committee
+
Legislature?
of safety?
+
 
Mr. HOES. Never.
+
Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he  
Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who were active
+
seen fit.
in that revolution?
+
 
Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation ?
+
Senator GRAY. Why would he do it?
Senator GRAY. AS to their plans.
+
 
Mr. HOES. NO ; I was in total ignorance of them.
+
Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have  
Senator GRAY. YOU were not in the movement?
+
been in favor of
Mr. HOES. NO.
+
annexation thought the time was ripe for it. That  
Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those three days?
+
leads me to say that, in
Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did.
+
my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours  
Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection? You could
+
previous to the prorogation
not say that you saw him at that time?
+
of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event  
Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it.
+
soon to be
Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own knowledge of his
+
consummated never entered the head of any man  
conduct during the period of which 1 have been speaking—three days?
+
composing the present
Mr. HOES. NO ; if you mean personal knowledge—knowledge that I
+
Government and its band of officials, not even  
would derive from Mr. Stevens himself.
+
Thurston's.
Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge.
+
 
Mr. HOES. NO.
+
Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the  
 +
course of the
 +
revolution, so called, so far as its time is  
 +
concerned, but after the
 +
revolution, after the events commenced to shape  
 +
themselves, did not you
 +
understand that annexation was a part of it?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read  
 +
by the Provisional
 +
Government.  
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the  
 +
committee of safety?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. Never.  
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who  
 +
were active in that
 +
revolution?  
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation?
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. As to their plans.
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. No; I was in total ignorance of them.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. You were not in the movement?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. No.  
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those  
 +
three days?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection?
 +
You could not say
 +
that you saw him at that time?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own  
 +
knowledge of his conduct
 +
during the period of which I have been speaking---- three
 +
days?
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. No; if you mean personal  
 +
knowledge---- knowledge that I would derive
 +
from Mr. Stevens himself.
 +
 
 +
Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge.
 +
 
 +
Mr. HOES. No.  
 +
 
 
Adjourned to meet on notice.
 
Adjourned to meet on notice.

Revision as of 13:49, 10 February 2006

-p1126-

Senator GRAY. You were on those islands, for the reasons that you have described, from what date?

Mr. HOES. From the 25th of September, 1891, until the 9th of March, 1893.

Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become very well acquainted with the residents of the island and the people, as you have related?

Mr. HOES. Yes.

Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable annexation sentiment before the emeute of January, 1893?

Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by the prominent people there, that annexation was the ultimate solution of the Hawaiian question, but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to when that event would take place.

Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the American population, so called?

Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it seemed to be generally prevalent.

Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there?

Mr. HOES. Yes.

Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the Saturday and Monday and Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this revolution, there was a movement for annexation?

Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared what it was for, so long as it resulted in the establishment of good government. I believe the people reposed such absolute confidence in the committee of safety that they would follow them through fire and water.

Senator GRAY. What people?

Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order and good government.

Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the Provincial Government at the time?

Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion that started it, and subsequently upheld it.

Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own observation, that on Monday and Tuesday, particularly Tuesday, it was mooted about that this movement was an annexation movement as a fact?

Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was.

Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member of the committee of safety and was active in the military operations and has testified before the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was active in doing, he found that he could not do it until he told them it was for annexation to the United States. Have you any knowledge on that subject?

Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that talked about at that time. The feeling of the people was simply as I have described it. It was such an intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed and acted in Hawaii, that any solution would have been accepted if advocated by the committee of safety.

Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the proclamation of the Provisional Government declared that it would be established until annexation should be declared between the islands and the United States.

Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I believe the meaning intended by that phrase----

Senator GRAY. Do you not know that Mr. Thurston has always been an ardent annexationist??

-p1127-

Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many addresses in the Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase advocating annexation.

Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the Legislature?

Mr. HOES. The Legislature was made up of a band of honest men on one side, pitted against an unprincipled rabble on the other. Mr. Thurston was never afraid to express his honest convictions at any proper time, or in any fitting place, and, had he so chosen, he would nave been as willing to advocate annexation in the Legislature as upon the public rostrum.

Senator GRAY. Did you expect him to advocate annexation in their Legislature?

Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he seen fit.

Senator GRAY. Why would he do it?

Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have been in favor of annexation thought the time was ripe for it. That leads me to say that, in my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours previous to the prorogation of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event soon to be consummated never entered the head of any man composing the present Government and its band of officials, not even Thurston's.

Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the course of the revolution, so called, so far as its time is concerned, but after the revolution, after the events commenced to shape themselves, did not you understand that annexation was a part of it?

Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read by the Provisional Government.

Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the committee of safety?

Mr. HOES. Never.

Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who were active in that revolution?

Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation?

Senator GRAY. As to their plans.

Mr. HOES. No; I was in total ignorance of them.

Senator GRAY. You were not in the movement?

Mr. HOES. No.

Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those three days?

Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did.

Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection? You could not say that you saw him at that time?

Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it.

Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own knowledge of his conduct during the period of which I have been speaking---- three days?

Mr. HOES. No; if you mean personal knowledge---- knowledge that I would derive from Mr. Stevens himself.

Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge.

Mr. HOES. No.

Adjourned to meet on notice.