Difference between revisions of "Template:1126-1127"
Ken Conklin (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | 1126 | + | {{p|1126}} |
− | Senator GRAY. | + | |
− | + | Senator GRAY. You were on those islands, for the | |
− | Mr. HOES. From | + | reasons that you have |
− | Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become very well | + | described, from what date? |
− | + | ||
− | related? | + | Mr. HOES. From the 25th of September, 1891, until the |
− | Mr. HOES. Yes. | + | 9th of March, 1893. |
− | Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable annexation | + | |
− | + | Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become | |
− | Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by the prominent | + | very well acquainted |
− | + | with the residents of the island and the people, as | |
− | question, but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to when that | + | you have related? |
− | event would take place. | + | |
− | Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the American | + | Mr. HOES. Yes. |
− | population, so called? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it seemed to be | + | Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable |
− | + | annexation sentiment | |
− | Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there? | + | before the emeute of January, 1893? |
− | Mr. HOES. Yes. | + | |
− | Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the Saturday and | + | Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by |
− | Monday and Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this revolution, | + | the prominent people |
− | there was a movement for annexation? | + | there, that annexation was the ultimate solution of |
− | Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared what it was for, | + | the Hawaiian question, |
− | + | but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to | |
− | believe the people reposed such absolute confidence in the committee | + | when that event would |
− | of safety that they would follow them through fire and water. | + | take place. |
− | Senator GRAY. What people? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order and good | + | Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the |
− | government. | + | American population, |
− | Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the Provincial | + | so called? |
− | Government at the time? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion | + | Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it |
− | Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own observation, that on | + | seemed to be generally |
− | + | prevalent. | |
− | this movement was an annexation movement as a fact? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was. | + | Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there? |
− | Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member of the | + | |
− | committee of safety and was active in the military operations and has | + | Mr. HOES. Yes. |
− | testified before the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was | + | |
− | active in doing, he found that he could not do it until he told them it | + | Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the |
− | was for annexation to the United States. Have you any knowledge | + | Saturday and Monday and |
− | on that subject? | + | Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this |
− | Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that talked about at | + | revolution, there was a |
− | that time. The feeling of the people was simply as I have described it. | + | movement for annexation? |
− | It was such an intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed and | + | |
− | acted in Hawaii, that any solution would have been accepted if advocated | + | Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared |
− | by the committee of safety. | + | what it was for, so |
− | Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the proclamation of the | + | long as it resulted in the establishment of good |
− | Provisional Government declared that it would be established until | + | government. I believe the |
− | annexation should be declared between the islands and the United | + | people reposed such absolute confidence in the |
− | States. | + | committee of safety that they |
− | Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I believe the meaning | + | would follow them through fire and water. |
− | intended by that phrase | + | |
− | Senator GRAY. | + | Senator GRAY. What people? |
− | an ardent annexationist ? | + | |
− | + | Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order | |
− | Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many addresses | + | and good government. |
− | in the Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase advocating | + | |
− | annexation. | + | Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the |
− | Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the | + | Provincial Government at |
− | + | the time? | |
− | + | ||
− | + | Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion that started it, and | |
− | + | subsequently upheld it. | |
− | + | ||
− | + | Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own | |
− | + | observation, that on Monday | |
+ | and Tuesday, particularly Tuesday, it was mooted about | ||
+ | that this movement | ||
+ | was an annexation movement as a fact? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member | ||
+ | of the committee of | ||
+ | safety and was active in the military operations and | ||
+ | has testified before | ||
+ | the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was | ||
+ | active in doing, he | ||
+ | found that he could not do it until he told them it | ||
+ | was for annexation to | ||
+ | the United States. Have you any knowledge on that | ||
+ | subject? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that | ||
+ | talked about at that time. | ||
+ | The feeling of the people was simply as I have | ||
+ | described it. It was such an | ||
+ | intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed | ||
+ | and acted in Hawaii, | ||
+ | that any solution would have been accepted if | ||
+ | advocated by the committee of | ||
+ | safety. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the | ||
+ | proclamation of the | ||
+ | Provisional Government declared that it would be | ||
+ | established until | ||
+ | annexation should be declared between the islands and | ||
+ | the United States. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I | ||
+ | believe the meaning | ||
+ | intended by that phrase---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Do you not know that Mr. Thurston has | ||
+ | always been an ardent | ||
+ | annexationist?? | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{p|1127}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many | ||
+ | addresses in the | ||
+ | Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase | ||
+ | advocating annexation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the | ||
Legislature? | Legislature? | ||
− | Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he seen fit. | + | |
− | Senator GRAY. Why would he do it? | + | Mr. HOES. The Legislature was made up of a band of |
− | Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have been in favor | + | honest men on one side, |
− | + | pitted against an unprincipled rabble on the other. | |
− | that, in my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours previous to | + | Mr. Thurston was never |
− | the prorogation of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event | + | afraid to express his honest convictions at any proper |
− | soon to be consummated never entered the head of any man composing | + | time, or in any |
− | the present Government and its band of officials, not even Thurston's. | + | fitting place, and, had he so chosen, he would nave |
− | Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the course of the | + | been as willing to |
− | revolution, so called, so far as its time is concerned, but after the revolution, | + | advocate annexation in the Legislature as upon the |
− | after the events commenced to shape themselves, did not you | + | public rostrum. |
− | understand that annexation was | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read by the Provisional | + | Senator GRAY. Did you expect him to advocate |
− | Government. | + | annexation in their |
− | Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the committee | + | Legislature? |
− | of safety? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. Never. | + | Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he |
− | Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who were active | + | seen fit. |
− | in that revolution? | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation ? | + | Senator GRAY. Why would he do it? |
− | Senator GRAY. | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. | + | Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have |
− | Senator GRAY. | + | been in favor of |
− | Mr. HOES. | + | annexation thought the time was ripe for it. That |
− | Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those three days? | + | leads me to say that, in |
− | Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did. | + | my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours |
− | Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection? You could | + | previous to the prorogation |
− | not say that you saw him at that time? | + | of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event |
− | Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it. | + | soon to be |
− | Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own knowledge of his | + | consummated never entered the head of any man |
− | + | composing the present | |
− | Mr. HOES. | + | Government and its band of officials, not even |
− | would derive from Mr. Stevens himself. | + | Thurston's. |
− | Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge. | + | |
− | Mr. HOES. | + | Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the |
+ | course of the | ||
+ | revolution, so called, so far as its time is | ||
+ | concerned, but after the | ||
+ | revolution, after the events commenced to shape | ||
+ | themselves, did not you | ||
+ | understand that annexation was a part of it? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read | ||
+ | by the Provisional | ||
+ | Government. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the | ||
+ | committee of safety? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. Never. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who | ||
+ | were active in that | ||
+ | revolution? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. As to their plans. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. No; I was in total ignorance of them. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. You were not in the movement? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. No. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those | ||
+ | three days? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection? | ||
+ | You could not say | ||
+ | that you saw him at that time? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own | ||
+ | knowledge of his conduct | ||
+ | during the period of which I have been speaking---- three | ||
+ | days? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. No; if you mean personal | ||
+ | knowledge---- knowledge that I would derive | ||
+ | from Mr. Stevens himself. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mr. HOES. No. | ||
+ | |||
Adjourned to meet on notice. | Adjourned to meet on notice. |
Revision as of 13:49, 10 February 2006
|
Senator GRAY. You were on those islands, for the reasons that you have described, from what date?
Mr. HOES. From the 25th of September, 1891, until the 9th of March, 1893.
Senator GRAY. You were there long enough to become very well acquainted with the residents of the island and the people, as you have related?
Mr. HOES. Yes.
Senator GRAY. Did you ever observe any considerable annexation sentiment before the emeute of January, 1893?
Mr. HOES. I observed a very general opinion held by the prominent people there, that annexation was the ultimate solution of the Hawaiian question, but I did not observe any particular sentiment as to when that event would take place.
Senator GRAY. Was that a growing sentiment among the American population, so called?
Mr. HOES. I do not know whether it was growing; it seemed to be generally prevalent.
Senator GRAY. I mean during the time you were there?
Mr. HOES. Yes.
Senator GRAY. Was it understood by you during the Saturday and Monday and Tuesday, which were the eventful ones in this revolution, there was a movement for annexation?
Mr. HOES. I do not believe the people knew or cared what it was for, so long as it resulted in the establishment of good government. I believe the people reposed such absolute confidence in the committee of safety that they would follow them through fire and water.
Senator GRAY. What people?
Mr. HOES. I mean the people who desired law and order and good government.
Senator GRAY. That is the portion that started the Provincial Government at the time?
Mr. HOES. Yes, the portion that started it, and subsequently upheld it.
Senator GRAY. Was it not a fact, in your own observation, that on Monday and Tuesday, particularly Tuesday, it was mooted about that this movement was an annexation movement as a fact?
Mr. HOES. I have not any recollection that it was.
Senator GRAY. One of the gentlemen who was a member of the committee of safety and was active in the military operations and has testified before the committee, in stirring up the people, as he was active in doing, he found that he could not do it until he told them it was for annexation to the United States. Have you any knowledge on that subject?
Mr. HOES. I have no recollection of hearing that talked about at that time. The feeling of the people was simply as I have described it. It was such an intense desire to be rid of royalty, as it had existed and acted in Hawaii, that any solution would have been accepted if advocated by the committee of safety.
Senator GRAY. Did you not understand that the proclamation of the Provisional Government declared that it would be established until annexation should be declared between the islands and the United States.
Mr. HOES. I believe it was so expressed, but, I believe the meaning intended by that phrase----
Senator GRAY. Do you not know that Mr. Thurston has always been an ardent annexationist??
|
Mr. HOES. I have heard Mr. Thurston make a great many addresses in the Legislature, but I never heard him use a phrase advocating annexation.
Senator GRAY. Would you expect to hear him in the Legislature?
Mr. HOES. The Legislature was made up of a band of honest men on one side, pitted against an unprincipled rabble on the other. Mr. Thurston was never afraid to express his honest convictions at any proper time, or in any fitting place, and, had he so chosen, he would nave been as willing to advocate annexation in the Legislature as upon the public rostrum.
Senator GRAY. Did you expect him to advocate annexation in their Legislature?
Mr. HOES. Yes; openly, at the proper time, had he seen fit.
Senator GRAY. Why would he do it?
Mr. HOES. I do not believe that those who might have been in favor of annexation thought the time was ripe for it. That leads me to say that, in my opinion, twenty-four hours, or even ten hours previous to the prorogation of that Legislature the idea of annexation as an event soon to be consummated never entered the head of any man composing the present Government and its band of officials, not even Thurston's.
Senator GRAY. Many things that occurred within the course of the revolution, so called, so far as its time is concerned, but after the revolution, after the events commenced to shape themselves, did not you understand that annexation was a part of it?
Mr. HOES. I did not until the proclamation was read by the Provisional Government.
Senator GRAY. Were you present at the meetings of the committee of safety?
Mr. HOES. Never.
Senator GRAY. Were you not consulted by persons who were active in that revolution?
Mr. HOES. What do you mean by consultation?
Senator GRAY. As to their plans.
Mr. HOES. No; I was in total ignorance of them.
Senator GRAY. You were not in the movement?
Mr. HOES. No.
Senator GRAY. Did you see Mr. Stevens during those three days?
Mr. HOES. I am unable to say, but very likely I did.
Senator GRAY. But you have no distinct recollection? You could not say that you saw him at that time?
Mr. HOES. I could not swear to it.
Senator GRAY. And you can not speak of your own knowledge of his conduct during the period of which I have been speaking---- three days?
Mr. HOES. No; if you mean personal knowledge---- knowledge that I would derive from Mr. Stevens himself.
Senator GRAY. What lawyers call personal knowledge.
Mr. HOES. No.
Adjourned to meet on notice.